Tag: rant

Wie über überfahrene Radfahrer berichtet wird

[How news report about cyclists killed by motorised traffic – summary at the end of German text]

Ein Freund machte mich auf einen Unfall aufmerksam, auch weil wir gelegentlich darüber reden, wie ich versuche meinen Arbeitsweg für mich sicherer zu machen. Also habe ich mal eine Suchmachine zu “neuhausen schellbronn unfall” befragt und da sehr unterschiedliche Ergebnisse erhalten:

Die “Badischen Neueste Nachrichten” schrieben [https://bnn.de/pforzheim/enzkreis/neuhausen/radfahrer-kommt-bei-unfall-zwischen-neuhausen-und-schellbronn-ums-leben]:

“… kollidierte der Autofahrer mit dem vorausfahrenden Mountainbikefahrer. …”

So ähnlich, mit etwas anderen Hintergrundinformationen scheibt auch PF-BITS [https://www.pf-bits.de/2024/01/toedlicher-verkehrsunfall-mit-fahrradfahrer/].

Währenddessen steht in der SZ (Süddeutsche Zeitung) einfach nur eine übernommene dpa Meldung mit [https://www.sueddeutsche.de/panorama/unfaelle-neuhausen-43-jaehriger-radfahrer-stirbt-bei-unfall-auf-l547-dpa.urn-newsml-dpa-com-20090101-240130-99-813673]:

“… Der 43-Jährige [Radfahrer] sei bei Schellbronn mit einem Auto zusammengestoßen, sagte ein Sprecher der Polizei am Dienstagabend. …”

(Alle Links können so wie sie sind in die Wayback Machine des Internet Archivs kopiert werden.)

Auch der Baden-Württembergische Landtag hat die dpa-Polizei-Meldung übernommen: https://www.landtag-bw.de/home/aktuelles/dpa-nachrichten/2024/Januar/KW5/Dienstag/470e9caa-cccf-447c-ad0b-aa7df51b.html. Ich habe dort um Stellungnahme zu dem Widerspruch gebeten.

Mich hat die Polizeiaussage getriggert, dass der Radfahrer mit dem Auto zusammengestoßen sei. Im Stadtverkehr mag das passieren, aber auf Landstraßen abseits von Kreuzungen ist das eher ungewöhnlich. Hier wird dem schwächeren Verkehrsteilnehmer und Opfer noch die Schuld am eigenen Tod gegeben.

Wenn man sich Polizeiberichte anschaut, wird man das immer wieder finden. Die Polizei sind selber Autofahrer und daher sind sie in ihrer Ausdrucksweise befangen. Dazu gibt es in unserer Gesellschaft nichts wichtigeres als ungestörten Autoverkehr, so was spiegelt sich nicht nur in Qualität und Schmalheit von Fuß- und Radwegen wieder, sondern auch im Sprachgebrauch.

Noch einen Zusatz für Verschörungstheoretiker: In der Polizeiaussage ist vom 27-jährigem Autofahrer die Rede. Das so jemand sein Auto nicht unter Kontrolle hat und einen Radfahrer übersieht, darf nicht sein, also hat man einen 77-jährigen draus gemacht?

Falls ich eine Antwort vom Landtag bekomme, werde ich hier noch ein Update hinzufügen.

Einmal in einer gefährlichen Situation sich selbst überschätzt und nicht abgebremst und mindestens ein, vermutlich aber auch das eigene und das von Angehörigen der beiden zerstört.

English: A cyclist died on the road. The news-agency stated the police with “the cyclist collided with the car”. This statement also ended up on the page of the parliament of Baden-Württemberg (one of the 16 German countries). Other news article mention that the car driver didn’t see the cyclist and crashed into him from behind. The discrepancy between who’s fault it was triggered me to write about it. My hypothesis is, that the police are drivers themselves and therefore they are biased in their language. There is nothing more important in our society than undisturbed car traffic. This is reflected not only in the quality and narrowness of footpaths and cycle paths, but also in language.

Update:

Die Landtagspressestelle hat ausführlich geantwortet. Leider wollten sie keine Updates hinzufügen. Ich zitier den Hauptgrund für die in meinen Augen problematische Formulierung aus der Email:

“Der Landtag von Baden-Württemberg ist für das inhaltliche Angebot des dpa-Nachrichtentickers nicht verantwortlich. Wir stellen den dpa-Nachrichtenticker auf unserer Homepage lediglich als Serviceangebot zur Verfügung.”

Lazy Coding

Steam, what are you doing on my machine? I have one chat window open, nothing else, there are NO messages going back and forth and yet my system stats show something like this (10 second integration):

    PID USER      PR  NI    VIRT    RES    SHR S  %CPU  %MEM     TIME+ COMMAND                                                                                                                                            
1578766 ronny     20   0 4857032 330216 165264 S  38.5   1.6   4:23.91 steamwebhelper                                                                                                                                     
1578554 ronny     20   0  592368 132636  82224 S  18.3   0.7   2:16.90 steamwebhelper                                                                                                                                     
1578596 ronny     20   0 9196408 420472 108172 S  13.2   2.1   1:48.26 steamwebhelper

The processes with the highest CPU load are steam, using 75% of one of my cores. For nothing. What is going on in the background?

I guess here we see the externalisation of developer costs. Instead of it decreasing Steam’s revenue for employing someone who implements the better solutions, every user is paying the costs in their electricity bill. For one user it’s only a few Watts, but 60 Million people use Steam on a daily basis. Even if everyone has Steam open for just an hour, we are talking about hundreds of Megawatthours per day, or tens of GWh a year. This is the equivalent to what over 10,000 households use a year.

Writing this down is a nice reminder for myself to try not to implement the lazy solution, but invest the extra brain work to create something I can be more proud.

While I wrote this text, the steamwebhelper processes accumulated 23 minutes CPU time (in 33 minutes runtime)

How to be a bad citizen (for Government)

########### Deutsche Version weiter unten #####

I think a government doesn’t particularly like me because of my affinity for bicycles. The starting point for my thoughts is: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-announces-new-long-term-plan-to-back-drivers. However, this is not limited to the UK, I think the German government (and others) are no better.

Although I have a driver’s license, I don’t own a car. In the past, when I lived in the city, this wasn’t a problem at all, but now in the countryside it’s sometimes a little more difficult, simply because the distances are a little longer, for example for the weekly shop. But I’m still fit and healthy enough that I can cycle five miles home even with 15 kg of luggage. And thanks to the development of electric bikes, I have little to worry about the future. At the same time, I still have the bus as an alternative, which runs every half hour at important times and every hour at other times to the next city. However, I’m lucky because the small villages in the area are less well connected. Sure, everything takes a little longer by bike or public transport, but I save time in the gym and, above all, money (or working hours to earn this money). And this is why governments don’t like me:

  • Spending less money reduces the gross national product. Unfortunately, this is how many people still measure their life satisfaction.
  • Having more time for positive things can lead to more criticism of the government.
  • The reduced car production requires fewer workers -> See gross national product.
  • Fewer cars means less road repairs and fewer new road construction projects -> labor force and gross national product.
  • Less sales from car manufacturers reduces their donations to parties. As a private individual, I do not have the financial means to enable the same corruption as the car manufacturers.
  • Less oil consumption reduces party donations from the oil lobby. As a member of a bicycle club, I cannot compensate for this corruption.
  • Less road construction reduces the turnover of large construction companies. This also breaks down the supportive connection between construction company bosses, politicians and bankers between them.
  • Less exhaust gases/fine dust/CO2 increases intelligence. No politician can want that. For example, “For too long politicians have focused on the short-term decisions with little regard for the long term impact on hardworking families.” should not be question critically. I’ll interpret this: We want to continue to force families to invest in at least two cars so that they have less time for their children, children that grow up in car-optimised places, are surrounded by noise and the consequences for the environment or climate, is a problem for future generations.

My thoughts included: “Yes Minister”, “Yes Prime Minister”, the almost non-existent consequences of emissions scandals, the refusal of work by German transport ministers, leaked coalition negotiations, lending to politicians, police laws of the last 5 years and much more from things that I picked up over the years.

################## Deutsch ###############

Ich glaube, aufgrund meiner Fahrradaffinität mag mich eine Regierung nicht besonders. Ausgangspunkt für meine Gedanken ist: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-announces-new-long-term-plan-to-back-drivers . Allerdings ist das nicht auf das Vereinigte Königreich beschränkt, ich glaube bei der deutschen Regierung oder in anderen Ländern ist das nicht besser.

Obwohl ich einen Führerschein habe, besitze ich kein Auto. Früher, als ich in der Stadt wohnte war das überhaupt kein Problem, jetzt auf dem Land ist es manchmal etwas schwieriger, einfach weil die Wege etwas länger sind, zum Beispiel für den Wocheneinkauf. Aber noch bin ich fit und gesund genug, dass ich auch mit 15 kg Gepäck acht Kilometer nach Hause radeln kann. Und dank der Elektrofahrradentwicklung, mache ich mir auch für die Zukunft wenig Sorgen. Gleichzeitig habe ich noch den Bus als Alternative, der zu den wichtigen Zeit halbstündlich und sonst zumindest stündlich in die nächste Stadt fährt. Damit habe ich jedoch Glück, die kleinen Dörfer in der Umgebung sind schlechter angeschlossen. Klar, dauert alles etwas länger mit dem Fahrrad oder Öffentlichen, dafür spar ich mir die Zeit im Fitnessstudio und vor allem aber Geld (oder Arbeitszeit um dieses Geld zu verdienen). Und das ist, warum mich Regierungen nicht mögen:

  • Weniger Geld auszugeben schmälert das Bruttosozialprodukt. Daran messen leider noch viele Menschen ihre Lebenszufriedenheit.
  • Mehr Zeit für positive Dinge zu haben, kann zu mehr Kritik an der Regierung führen.
  • Die verringerte Autoproduktion braucht weniger Arbeitskräfte -> Siehe Bruttosozialprodukt.
  • Weniger Autos bedeutet weniger Straßenreparatur und weniger Straßenneubauprojekte -> Arbeitskräfte und Bruttosozialprodukt.
  • Weniger Umsatz der Autohersteller verringert die Parteispenden von denen. Als Privatmensch habe ich nicht die finanziellen Möglichkeiten die gleiche Korruption zu ermöglichen wie die Autobauer.
  • Weniger Ölverbrauch verringter die Parteispenden durch die Öllobby. Diese Korruption kann ich als Mitglied in einem Fahrradklub nicht ausgleichen.
  • Weniger Straßenbau verringert den Umsatz der großen Baufirmen. Damit bricht auch der Filz zwischen Baufirmenchefs, Politikern, und Bankern dazwischen weg.
  • Weniger Abgase/Feinstaub/CO2 erhöht die Intelligenz. Das kann kein Politiker wollen. Zum Beispiel “For too long politicians have focused on the short-term decisions with little regard for the long term impact on hardworking families.” kritisch zu hinterfragen. Ich interpretiere mal: Wir möchten weiterhin Familien dazu zwingen in mindestens zwei Autos zu investieren, damit sie weniger Zeit für ihre Kinder haben, deren Kindern in Auto-optimierten Orten aufwachsen, von Lärm umgeben sind und die Konsequenzen auf die Umwelt oder Klima, ist ein Problem für zukünftige Generationen.

In meine Gedanken eingeflossen sind: “Yes Minister”, “Yes Primeminister”, die fast nicht vorhandenen Konsequenzen von Abgasskandalen, die Arbeitsverweigerung deutscher Verkehrsminister, geleakte Koalitionsverhandlungen, Kreditvergabe an Politiker, Polizeigesetze der letzen 5 Jahre und vieles Mehr, was man über die Jahr so aufschnappt.

Climate crisis at home (update)

Five and a half weeks after me writing about the dry weather in the UK we finally got some substantial rain (about 25 mm over 8 hours). After the rain I took another picture of the same hole as before:

Deep cracks in the soil in the garden on 25 August 2022. The remaining green grass is less green, trees are getting rid of their leaves due to drought. The hole has slightly filled up with soil falling of the cliffs.
Deep cracks in the soil in the garden on 25 August 2022. The remaining green grass is less green, trees are getting rid of their leaves due to drought. The hole has slightly filled up with soil falling of the cliffs.

The old picture:

Deep cracks in the soil in the garden, less than 10 cm of the 30 cm ruler stick out. At least some grass is still green, and we hope for rain before all died back.
Deep cracks in the soil in the garden on 17 July 2022. Less than 10 cm of the 30 cm ruler stick out of the crack. At least some grass is still green, and we hope for rain before all dies back.

I thought that the cracks got bigger, however, the pictures don’t show a clear widening of the crack. It’s not completely clear due to the different angles of the pictures. But still a good example why we shouldn’t rely on feelings or opinions when making decisions, but on measurable facts.

After the rain I also wanted to see how deep the moisture penetrated the soil, 6 hours after the end of the rain I dug a tiny hole. I was surprised how quickly the spade stopped, due to hitting dry soil:

The 25 mm of rain penetrated about 50 mm of soil, below the soil is still bone dry.
The 25 mm of rain penetrated about 50 mm of soil, below the soil is still bone dry.

It will take a lot more rainy days before the moisture will reach depths of over a meter and even longer to fill up the aquifers. With the measurement from our garden today, I think we would need this amount of rain every day for at least a month to counteract the drought. Forecast predicts no rain for the next 7 days, so I guess the top layer of the soil will be again completely dry by the time the next rain will be here.

Below I copied the text from my original article. And I actually feel I was quite good with my actions. I kept cycling most local journeys and reduced my meat and milk consumption and just bought the train tickets to go to Germany in a month (which is not the easiest travel, but luckily there is help: https://www.seat61.com/Germany.htm#london-to-leipzig-and-dresden-by-train)

In future these droughts are likely to occur more often, the last IPCC report is very clear about this. And there are things we can do. Like planting some trees in the garden (and maybe on fields?). From my experience in Germany and the UK, people don’t like trees in the garden (all this work with the leaves, …) but in our garden there is a clear difference in the number and size of the cracks in the shade of the tree and in the grass area. And huge difference in grass colour. I hope we can convince our landlord, to get the approval for a few more trees.

The reason for the climate crisis now, is however the behaviour of the generations from the 1960 up to mine. An economy was build on cheap oil and gas, without paying the true costs (and now people complain, when they have to pay prices closer to the real costs). All the work that needs to go in moving cities away from the coast, to repair infrastructure after it was hit by a heat wave (or much heavier/frequent storms/floods), all the lives lost in heat waves and other severe weather. We are paying now for the living standard of our grandparents (And poor countries for the wealth of rich countries, the colonialism still continues). And a further problem is the inflexibility for change in these generations (don’t take away my petrol car or the 200 km/h on a German motorway, I want to drive everywhere, why do I need to see wind farms or solar parks in my neighbourhood, one day a week without meat? – How dare you!). Unfortunately, these are the people that make politics and decisions. And they (and me) will be dead when we reach the 4°C average warming by the end of the century (that is the scenario our current goals announced by the politics head to), and future generations will have to deal with that. Parents usually say they love their children, but somehow their actions feel different.

So what can I do:

  • do I need to use a car, or can I spent a few minutes longer on the public transport (less stress) or use an (electric) bicycle (saves the gym visit)?
  • can I eat more plant based products? (lentil burger/bolognese, oat milk, bean based spread instead of salami)
  • do I need to take the plane, or can I spent a bit longer, but use the train? (challenging)

Climate crisis at home

Before I moved to the UK, I heard of the rainy, foggy weather here. Typical English weather. But I have to say, that is not at all my experience. During the cycle commutes to and from work I got wet rarely and only at the a similar rate as in Germany. Although, these cycles are slightly biased, as I check the rain radar and have stayed half an hour longer to let rain pass, or left work a bit earlier to get home before the rain clouds arrived.

Deep cracks in the soil in the garden, less than 10 cm of the 30 cm ruler stick out. At least some grass is still green, and we hope for rain before all died back.
Deep cracks in the soil in the garden on 17 July 2022. Less than 10 cm of the 30 cm ruler stick out of the crack. At least some grass is still green, and we hope for rain before all dies back.

Now it has been a very long time since I last was out in the rain. And that’s not because I haven’t been out. While most of June was relatively cool with many days below 20°C, it didn’t rain much. So far July was very dry as well, at higher temperatures. The really hot days, however, are still ahead.

The dry weather is definitely visible now. On my recent cycles I saw so many brown meadows or village greens. And the cracks in the soil in our garden get bigger and bigger. I never have seen such deep cracks in soil with vegetation on it.

In future these droughts are likely to occur more often, the last IPCC report is very clear about this. And there are things we can do. Like planting some trees in the garden (and maybe on fields?). From my experience in Germany and the UK, people don’t like trees in the garden (all this work with the leaves, …) but in our garden there is a clear difference in the number and size of the cracks in the shade of the tree and in the grass area. And huge difference in grass colour. I hope we can convince our landlord, to get the approval for a few more trees.

The reason for the climate crisis now, is however the behaviour of the generations from the 1960 up to mine. An economy was build on cheap oil and gas, without paying the true costs (and now people complain, when they have to pay prices closer to the real costs). All the work that needs to go in moving cities away from the coast, to repair infrastructure after it was hit by a heat wave (or much heavier/frequent storms/floods), all the lives lost in heat waves and other severe weather. We are paying now for the living standard of our grandparents (And poor countries for the wealth of rich countries, the colonialism still continues). And a further problem is the inflexibility for change in these generations (don’t take away my petrol car or the 200 km/h on a German motorway, I want to drive everywhere, why do I need to see wind farms or solar parks in my neighbourhood, one day a week without meat? – How dare you!). Unfortunately, these are the people that make politics and decisions. And they (and me) will be dead when we reach the 4°C average warming by the end of the century (that is the scenario our current goals announced by the politics head to), and future generations will have to deal with that. Parents usually say they love their children, but somehow their actions feel different.

So what can I do:

  • do I need to use a car, or can I spent a few minutes longer on the public transport (less stress) or use an (electric) bicycle (saves the gym visit)?
  • can I eat more plant based products? (lentil burger/bolognese, oat milk, bean based spread instead of salami)
  • do I need to take the plane, or can I spent a bit longer, but use the train? (challenging)

Racism in the middle of society

Actually I wanted to meet a friend tonight who has his job at the university in Central Europe and wanted to go to a friends wedding at the weekend and wanted to see some other friends before then. But as the meetup didn’t work, I can write a little bit about racism. Racism is the reason why he cannot enter the UK. He has the wrong passport and therefore does not have the privileges that one has with a Western European, North American, and probably also Australian, New Zealand, or Japanese passport: You can get into almost any other country without a visa. He only got as far as the check-in counter at the airport, where he was told that he was not allowed to go to England and would need a visa to enter the country. It’s just not on the British Border Control website, so he didn’t apply for one. And for many years he could easily travel without a visa.

At least the airline was kind enough to put him on a later flight so that he could make a few phone calls to the British Embassy and his nationality’s embassies in the capital and in London, as well as British border control. And there seems to be this rule with the visas, but not officially, because the British are too cowardly to cancel the mutual agreement on visa free entry, and instead have only an internal rule for their own border protection. After seven hours of phone calls, it was clear that the trip would not work out.

And of course nobody is responsible either, there is nothing official, so that he will still have to pay his own expenses.

And all because he was born in a country on the African continent. And that’s the racism of the white western world. This is not only a British problem, also in France, Denmark, Germany, Spain, Austria, Sweden, other European countries we treat certain groups of people as second class citizens. Every day.

Carbon responsible travel

After the pandemic situation became better again, I started looking into travelling from the UK to Germany. Preferably by train, as flying is just not good in a climate crisis. And I travelled by train before several times a year. With the German DB “Super Sparpreis EU” one could book a ticket from London St Pancras to, lets say Dresden or return. Depending on how busy the trains were, I spent something between 70€ and 120€ per direction, maybe a bit more during Christmas. That was 2018.

When I checked this year to travel a month in advance, no public holidays, Prices ware around £75 for the leg London to Brussels and then another £60 to £80 from Brussels to Dresden. I don’t know if that is expensive, it’s definitely over 50% more expensive than 4 years ago.

And then I made the mistake and checked flights. It was shocking to see that they started at £7 for each way. And that was only 2.5 weeks in advance. Luggage adds another £21, and I would need another 17€ for the local train to my final destination. But that is still cheaper than any of the two parts of the train trip for the whole distance.

I understand that these plane ticket prices are not the real costs, the airline will make the money with the people who by tickets at a later stage (although, even for the flight tomorrow the price is still only £18, so probably they need to subsidise from other flights). And yet, I find it astonishing that the climate damaging travel is still cheaper than the more responsible travel.